CONTEMPORARY CRIMINOLOGY THEORY SYLLABUS

 

M/W 1:00 - 2:15

 

Contemporary Criminology Theory course documents

Return to MAIN PAGE

 

PROFESSOR 

Dr. E. Wilma van der Veen, B. Honours Math, Ph.D. Sociology

Phone:  902-420-5883 with voicemail                

Email: wwolfvan@yahoo.com 

Webpage:  husky1.stmarys.ca/~evanderveen/wvdv

Office:  MS 300F

Office hours:  M/W 2:30 – 3:30, T/TH 2-3 and by appointment

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION

This course introduces students to major contemporary theories of criminology. Theories will include those associated with issues of social class, gender and race, including but not limited to radical criminology, feminist criminology, peacemaking criminology. By analyzing a variety of theories, it is also hoped that the student will develop a theoretical view of her/his own and a critical (i.e., analytical) orientation toward theory in particular and social interaction in general. This course will provide you with an opportunity to explore ideas and philosophies about human nature as they relate to criminology and thus will require you to self-examine yourself by either re-examining and/or developing your views pertaining to this matter..

 

COURSE INSTRUCTION

The course objectives will be achieved through a program of readings, class discussions and activities, and written work. THIS IS AN INTERACTIVE COURSE, NOT SOLELY LECTURE BASED.

 

COURSE TEXTS

Aylward, Carol. A., (1999), Canadian Critical Race Theory: Racism and the Law, Fernwood: Halifax

Holdaway, Simon and Paul Rock, eds., (1998), Thinking About Criminology, University of Toronto Press: Toronto

Naffine, Ngaire, (1997), Feminism and Criminology, Temple University Press: Philadelphia

Pepinsky, Hal, (1998), A Criminologist's Quest for Peace, http://www.critcrim.org/critpapers/pepinsky-book.htm

 

ASSESSMENT

Theory reflection reports (3 submissions 25 points each) 75,  approx. 27%

Question on theories for debates (3 submissions – 10 points each) 30, approx. 11%

Debate project (50 debate & 50 report) 100, approx. 36%

Class participation (3 points per class x 12 classes) 36, approx. 13%

Attendance (3 points per class x 12 classes) 36,  approx. 13%

-----

TOTAL 277 Final grade pro-rated to 100%

 

WRITTEN WORK

The written work for this class is composed of various submissions. The following applies to all written submissions:

Due dates: Due dates for assignments are given for good reason and acceptance of this syllabus indicates your agreement to meet said due dates. In general, late work will not be accepted. In EXTREME cases where late work may be deemed acceptable there will be substantial penalties to the assessment. As a general rule, late submissions will have a minimum 10% penalty deducted of the assessment for the first day, and then 10% each subsequent day late. A day is considered to be either a week or weekend day.

Submission: Do not submit your papers in folders; simply staple the pages together at the upper left-hand corner. Be sure to keep a copy of your paper in case it goes missing. Electronic copies of written work will only be accepted to prove on time submission of work; a hard copy must be submitted to receive a grade on the work by the next class after said due date. If no hard copy is provided by this time you will receive a zero on the work. When submitting papers not directly to myself, papers can be left with the secretaries of the sociology and criminology department, however, make sure the person receiving the paper signs it and notes the date of receipt. Unless otherwise specified, all written work must be typed and in complete sentence form.

Questions: If you have any questions about the written work, consult with me well in advance of the due date.

Sources:  several sources should be used to explore the topic/question outside of the textbooks (the minimum number of sources required will be supplied when specific work is assigned). Sources for ALL ideas presented and quotations used are to be properly referenced using a recognized bibliographic format, e.g. APA. Penalties will result if this referencing is not undertaken, amounting to a minimum of 10% of the grade. If you wish to include personal ideas, you must seek at least two academic sources for this idea in order to prove its validity, or demonstrate how your idea is derived from two other academic sources. Remember: Don’t confuse your own subjective interpretation with sociological ones and don’t make value statements in substitution for critical thinking

Writing style: all written work is to be written using 3rd person and formal academic writing style unless specified otherwise. Students are expected to write at a college level with appropriate and effective use of the English language. Those who have difficulty with writing are encouraged to contact the respective SMU department for additional assistance.

Returned written work: In a class where you have received returned graded written work, you are NOT to consult with me immediately after class with queries pertaining to this assessment. You must take the time to review your work and then if still necessary discuss the matter after one week has passed.

 

THEORY REFLECTION REPORTS – 3 submissions- 25 points each

Various theories will be covered this semester, some receiving more coverage than others. You will be required to write 3 reflection reports describing your thoughts on the theory and theorist(s). Questions will be assigned in class and online which you will be required to address in your reflection reports. These reports can be written in first person. It is expected that you provide comments drawing upon the reading(s), AND the debate AND subsequent class discussion, AND additional academic sources providing appropriate referencing. Word length: approximately 1500..

 

GROUP THEORY DEBATE – 100 points – 50 report, 50 debate presentation

During the second week of class, the class will be divided into groups and assigned a theory to research, either taking the stand of being in favor or against this theory. Your group will need to research the theory in depth knowing both sides of the argument, initially drawing upon the assigned readings but also seeking additional material. Some additional material will be available on reserve in the library. Steps to follow in undertaking a debate will be provided online, e.g. providing opening and closing statements, arguments in favor of the theory, counter arguments to criticisms of the theory, comments on validity and reliability of the theory, theory in policy and practice. Each member of the group must be well versed in all aspects of the theory. In the debate you may wish to address and include the following: quotes describing key points of the theory; applicability of the theory to different types of crimes, groups of people, societies, cultures, etc…; research which has been undertaken using this theory; policies which reflect theory.

Class time will be provided for groups to meet. One group paper is to be submitted for this project, comprehensively discussing the above points. However, each individual group member will be required to submit a commentary on division of workload and describing what were their responsibilities. The group project paper is due one week following the debate. Word length: approximately 3000. Assessment will be based on both the actual debate and the written report, and will include an individual and a group component.

 

QUESTIONS FOR DEBATE – 3 submissions –10 points each

Associated with each theory to be explored in this course are assigned readings and then a debate. Each student will be required to submit to me 2 copies of at least 2 questions that pertain to the theory under exploration. Each question must provide a rational (reason) for asking the question. The material from which to base the questions are the readings but may pertain to issues only slightly addressed by the reading. (The members of the debating teams do not supply questions for their own theory to be debated). These questions are meant to provide either side of the debating teams with additional material from which to derive arguments for/against their position. On the day of the debate, the debate moderators will choose several of these questions to be asked of the debating teams, questions which will be posed by the author of the question. These questions are due one week prior to the debate.

 

ATTENDANCE – 36 points (3 points per class)

Attendance is expected and will be taken during each class. Your attendance and participation is very important to your learning and that of other students in this class. It will become apparent if you have not conducted the readings and thus are unable to contribute constructive discussion in the class.

In general, I make no distinction between "excused" and "unexcused" absences. This frees you from having to bring a note from your doctor or something of that nature. I know that there are times when real life comes into conflict with the demands of pursuing an education, but your attendance in this class is important and you should make it a priority. If you are unable to attend at least 80% of the classes, then it is advisable that you withdraw from the course or else risk the application of penalties in the assessment. Two missed class periods are allowed, with each subsequent class missed amounting to a 3 point deduction in this component of the assessment. The 2 allotted absences are to be used in the event that dire circumstances keep you from class. Use the absences at your discretion, but DO NOT VIEW THESE ALLOTTED ABSENCES AS SKIP DAYS!!! The absences are provided because I understand that real life occasionally collides with your school responsibilities and these absences give you the flexibility to responsibly manage conflicting circumstances that may arise during the course of the semester without severe consequences for your point total. If you have MAJOR extenuating circumstances requiring an extended absence from campus (e.g. an accident or illness that requires extensive hospitalization, a death in the family, etc.), please see me and we may be able to make arrangements and/or will talk about the options the University provides for dropping, withdrawing, switching to audit, and so on.

If you are late, YOU are responsible for checking with me after class on the day you were late to correct the record. It is simply not feasible to alter attendance records days or even weeks after the fact. Excessive tardiness may result in a further loss of points from the final grade. If you are late for a class, simply slip in as quietly as possible.

 

PARTICIPATION – 36 points (3 points per class)

Informed and constructive participation in class discussion is also expected. The course outline lists readings for each week. You must read and/or prepare all materials prior to the class period for which they are assigned. It is also helpful if you approach this class with an open mind and a sense of enthusiasm for learning. Participation is awarded for your involvement in in-class activities, exercises, discussions, and so on. Please note that participation points are awarded based on your active involvement and genuine participation, NOT for mere attendance (which is expected as a minimal requirement and is addressed above).

 

STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES for Contemporary Criminology Theory 301.2C Winter 2006

The following are a list of expectations you the student can have of me the professor for this course, and expectations I have of you during the course. If you have any questions or concerns about these expectations, then it is your responsibility to bring these to my attention during the first few weeks of classes. Otherwise it is understood that you agree to abide by these rights and responsibilities.

Your rights:

course syllabus will be followed, and sufficient notice will be given if any changes will take place
clear explanations of written work including assessment
respect from myself and from other students
office hours are scheduled and appointments can be made
reasonable assistance individually in understanding the course material if necessary will be provided during office hours or scheduled appointments

Your responsibilities:

this is your education so take it seriously and make it a priority
be organized and do not procrastinate
show up to class on time
attend all classes
hand in all written work on time
do readings of assigned chapters prior to each week’s class (you need to allocate at least 2 hours for this each week)
contribute to class discussions and activities voluntarily and when called upon
provide valid reasons for absences and in a timely manner
seek out me if you are having difficulties and doing poorly early on and not towards the end of the semester
respect the opinions of others and put yourself in the shoes of others to better understand them
if having learning challenges or other issues which will affect your learning, inform me in advance
know what is taking place each week with regard to readings and assignment of written work and due dates
turn off all cell phones and pagers during class
seek out explanation of assessment of written work during office hours or scheduled appointments, not directly after class upon return of graded written work

As your professor, I am responsible for facilitating learning and serving as a resource for you in this class. It is my job to challenge you, to consider your work against the standards I set forth and those of a tertiary educational institution, and to evaluate your efforts based on my years of training and my years of teaching in the field of Sociology. As students, you are responsible for being here, for participating in class, for completing assignments in an appropriate and timely fashion, and for learning. Staying on top of things, being self-motivated, and putting forth adequate effort are all a part of the equation for you to earn a good grade in this course.

That said, I'd like to remind you that it is best if you do not equate your self worth with your grade in this class or on any assignment. You may be an "A+ person" who happened to perform at a C+ level on a given assignment. Remember that grades are an indication of your performance in mastering the material at hand at one point in time. They do not condemn you to a life of doom and drudgery. Nor are they an indicator of my views of you as a person. Reflect on your grade in an honest and realistic fashion before flying off the handle. Remember that I am hired to offer constructive criticism of your speeches, papers, and so on. Digest that criticism and then ask yourself questions like: Did I put in the preparation time that would've been necessary to receive a better grade?, Did I understand the assignment as fully as I could have?, Did I turn in all the required paperwork?, Did I do an adequate job of proofreading, running a spell check? If you find that you still have questions about how you can improve or about course content, come see me and we will talk about additional ways for you to work on your mastery of the subject matter.

A few thoughts about attitude... It has been my experience that students who approach their education with a sense of excitement and a willingness to learn are more productive students. Holding on to the belief that you HAVE TO take this course prevents you from embracing the point of view that you GET TO take this course. This course may be outside your major area of interest, but the content will still relate to your daily activities at home, work, and school. We will laugh, we will experience nervousness, we will think critically, we will speak, we will listen, and we will learn. Most importantly, we will do these things together. There is no room for negative criticism of others and there is no room for laughter at the expense of another in this class. Enjoy the class and look for the concepts to be applicable in your daily life and I think you'll be surprised at what you can accomplish this semester.  

 

PLAGIARISM, ACADEMIC DISHONESTY, AND DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR

Cheating and plagiarism are unacceptable. Plagiarism is quoting from, paraphrasing, or using specific ideas contained in any published work, e.g. books periodicals, public documents, internet, etc…, or using another person’s ideas without providing an appropriate citation or recognition which credits the author and/or origin of the work or idea, and presenting them as if they are your own. Academic dishonesty can refer to a range of inappropriate and unethical behaviours including but not limited to cheating on exams, falsification of sources, and so on. As in other courses at the University, students in this class are expected to do their own work and conduct themselves in a fair, honest, and ethical manner. Those who plagiarize or engage in academic dishonesty of any kind may minimally expect to fail the assignment at hand and perhaps the entire course. In addition, instances of academic dishonesty and plagiarism may be dealt with through proper University channels for investigation and disciplinary action.

 

"Disruptive behaviour" includes but is not limited to talking when someone else has the floor, being rude to other people, destructive (rather than constructive) criticism of another, arriving late repeatedly, sleeping during class, belligerent or aggressive behaviour, and so on. These behaviours have no place in a college classroom. You have a right to maintain your own opinions and to disagree with others, but you must do so in a fashion that is conducive to learning and does not take the form of a personal attack on others. Minimally, you are expected to treat your classmates and your professor in a respectful fashion and they will return the favour. Any behaviour that obstructs or disrupts the classroom teaching and learning environment will be addressed. Serious or repeated breaches in appropriate behaviour may result in a reduction of your final grade in the course and may be referred to additional University authorities.

 

GRADING SCALE

A+ 96 - 100%   

A 90 – 95   

A- 85 – 89

B+ 80 – 84

B 75 – 79

B- 70 – 74 

C+ 67 – 69

C 64 – 66

C- 60 - 63

D 50 – 59

F 0 – 49

Refer to the SMU Catalogue for a description of what a letter grade represents in terms of GPA.

Remember an "A" denotes exceptional work. All assignments and policies indicated above and below must be completed and/or carried out in a satisfactory manner in order to receive a passing grade in this class. . To calculate your grade in the course as we go along, simply calculate the percentage of points you have earned from the total thus far in the class.

 

COURSE OUTLINE

Chapters denote readings to be completed prior to each week. It is imperative that you read the chapter(s) before coming to class so that you will have a basic foundation of the topic in class discussions and activities.

 

IF THERE IS A CLASS CANCELATION DUE TO SNOW, THE OUTLINE IS PUSHED BACK BY THAT ONE CLASS.

WEEK 1 – January 2nd

Introduction to course and students – DO NOT MISS THIS CLASS – you will be at a disadvantage if you do

 

WEEK 2 – January 9th

Topic: Deviance, power & police

Readings: Thinking about Crim. Ch. 2, 5, 8

Debate teams assigned Wednesday

 

WEEK 3 – January 16th

Topic: Left realism

Readings: Thinking about Crim. Ch. 6

Questions for debate due Wednesday

 

WEEK 4 – January 23rd

Topic: Left realism cont’d

Wednesday Debate: Left realism

 

WEEK 5 – January 30th

Topic: Gender, feminism and criminology

Readings: Thinking about Crim. Ch. 3, 4

 

WEEK 6 – February 6th

Topic: Feminist criminology

Readings: Feminism and Criminology Part I

Reflection report on Left Realism due Monday

Questions for debate due Wednesday

 

WEEK 7 – February 13th

Topic: Feminist criminology cont’d

Readings: Feminism and Criminology Part II

Wednesday Debate on feminist criminology

 

WEEK 8 – February 20th - no classes

 

WEEK 9 – February 27th

Topic: Race relations, race & criminology

Reading: Critical Race Theory: Intro, ch 1, 2 & 3

Reflection report on Feminist Criminology due Monday

Questions for debate due Wednesday

 

WEEK 10 – March 6th

Topic: Race and criminology cont’d

Readings: Critical Race Theory: Ch. 4, 5 & Conclusion

Wednesday Debate on race and criminology

 

WEEK 11 – March 13th

Topic: Nonviolence

Readings: Pepinsky’s online text – chapters 1-3

 

WEEK 12 – March 20th

Topic: Peacemaking Criminology

Reading: Pepinsky’s online text, chapters 4 -5

Reflection report on Race & Criminology due Monday

Questions for debate due Wednesday

 

WEEK 13 – March 27th

Topic: Peacemaking Criminology continued

Readings: chapter 6-7

Wednesday Debate on Peacemaking criminology

 

WEEK 14 – April 3rd – LAST WEEK OF CLASSES

Topic: Abolitionism

Readings: TAC Ch. 7

Reflection report on Peacemaking Crim. due Monday

Evaluation & wrap up

 

NOTE: The professor reserves the right to change the course syllabus. The students will be given sufficient advanced notice of any changes should they arise.

 

 

Contemporary Criminology Theory course documents

Return to MAIN PAGE

 

 

 

Revised: December 31, 2005 .