![]()
CLASSIC THEORIES EXPLAINING DEVIANCY
![]()
19th Century Biological positivism - seeking causes
|
Born criminal: Lombroso - prison doctor, criminals and noncriminals were at different stages of development, physical features of person, e.g. size and shape of skull, cheekbones, Darwin was popular at time | |
|
Types of people: Dugdale, hereditary factors, studies of entire families, Goddard - feeblemindedness, i.e. lack of intelligence made one incapable of understanding potential immorality of behaviour and less able to control emotions. 3 categories concept is explanation in itself for delinquent behaviour: | |
|
Delinquent: people who can change their ways if receive right sort of guidance | |
|
Dependant: people whose well-being depended on assistance of others | |
|
Defective: people with limited abilities, and thus not to be responsible for actions | |
|
Eugenics: sterilization | |
|
Dangerous class - "the poor": parents seen as such but not children |
20th Century Biological positivism
|
Twins and adopted children | |
|
Body types: Sheldon, 3 body types endomorph are soft and round, mesomorph are muscular and athletic - the criminal!!, and ectomorph are thin and fragile | |
|
Chromosones | |
|
IQ - class and race bias inherent in such tests | |
|
Learning disabilities - causes not known | |
|
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): found in delinquent children |
Criticisms
|
Who is being measured - prison populations or boys or poor people | |
|
Spuriousness and time priority: failure to account for cause and effect | |
|
Fail to account for environmental impacts on behaviour and thus overestimate biological impact | |
|
Responses to conditions |
In conclusion: modern biological theorists speak of behaviour potentialities, susceptibilities and probabilities.
Psychological Positivism
|
Psychoanalytic theories: Freud and Erikson, underdeveloped and overdeveloped superego | |
|
Behaviourism: Skinner and Pavlov, how people learn to behave, idea is that behaviour is conditioned by rewards (reinforcements) and punishmentspeople break the law because they can do so and not be punished, law and order approach cornerstone, ignores thought in learning | |
|
Social learning theory: Bandura, learning process is cognitive rather than behavioural, learn through imitation and watching others, idea for copycat crime and violence & TV & children, can't account for differences in cognition | |
|
Moral Development theory: Piaget and Kolhberg, delinquents are said to be at a lower stage of moral development, focused on boys (justice) and not girls (caring and responsibility) and the two have different moral orientation | |
|
Personality theory: Healy and Bronner, a particular trait or set of traits produces delinquency, a type of person, time priority and spuriousness are a problem | |
|
Antisocial Personality Disorder theory: Eysenck and Shoemaker |
CONSENSUS THEORIES: what needs to be explained is why some people are involved in delinquent behaviour assuming most are non-delinquent.
Sociological Positivism - Durkheim
|
Social Disorganization and Strain theory: Shaw and McKay of Chicago school, analyzing spatial distribution of social problems and their relation to physical environment - Human Ecology where city is divided into zones and some are socially disorganized with all the urban problems | |
|
Anomie: Durkheim and Merton, a state of normlessness in which rules are no longer sufficient to control social behaviour, strain theory asserts children are basically good and engage in delinquent behaviour under conditions of stress | |
|
Delinquent Subculture: Cohen, a group solution to the frustration of being unable to achieve middle-class goals, lower class youth do not share social values, lifestyles and skills of middle-class youth but find themselves in the latter's world | |
|
Differential Opportunity: Cloward and Ohlin, access to opportunity structures, illegal ones when access to legal ones is not available (Merton only focused on legal ones) | |
|
Criticisms: focus too much on class, focus on educational and occupational sources of strain | |
|
Culture and Learning Theory | |
|
Class culture: Miller, focus on cultural factors, e.g. family structure | |
|
Differential Association: Sutherland, delinquent behaviour is learned by interacting with others who are delinquent, organized communities not like Shaw and McKay, delinquents and nondelinquents have same needs and values | |
|
Drift and Delinquency: Matza, delinquent behaviour is situational rather than learned, something that juveniles drift in and out of as situations, circumstances and opportunities present themselves, youth rationalize their behaviour | |
|
Techniques of Neutralization: Sykes and Matza, 5 defence mechanisms or t of n that youth use to rationalize, justify or excuse the negative aspects of their delinquent behaviour: denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of victim, condemnation of the condemners, appeal to higher loyalties |
CONTROL THEORIES: what needs to be explained is why most people are not involved in delinquent behaviour.
|
Containment: Reckless, pull and push factors, outer pulls or environmental factors such poverty, inner pushes or psychological or biological factors such as hostility, external containment factors or outer controls such as community ties, internal containment controls such as positive self-concept | |
|
Social Bond: Hirschi, not why do they do it but why do we not do it, the social bond includes attachment, commitment, involvement and beliefs are what prevent youth from doing it. |
![]()
Return to MAIN PAGE |